Jump to content
Wednesday, July 12, 2017

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 01/19/2019 in all areas

  1. 1 point
    The German U-Boat. The Deadliest Hunter Of The Sea -The Destroyer of Souls - Jay Hemmings for example, I started reading it and was stopped in my tracks by the assertion "and they were the first nation to use subs during that particular war". Rubbish. Britain was equipped with operational Submarines at the start of the war. Then I got to "In 1939, when the Second World War broke out, Germany had only managed to construct 57 U-boats, but these new U-boats were far sturdier and more technologically advanced than their WWI predecessors, featuring heat-seeking torpedoes, large gun decks, and spiderweb mines". I stopped reading at that point. There is just no room for these sorts of errors in a historical narrative and I'm afraid errors and ommissions of this magnitude make a nonsense of the whole article. To be fair to Mr. Hemmings, he is not the only one authoring articles with significant errors of fact in them and it detracts from the whole site when they are allowed to get past publishers.
  2. 1 point
    First off, let me apologize to all for what clearly appears to be a "rant" in my initial comment. But it is frustrating to see this error repeatedly in the articles on this site. But to answer Philip, the differences between right and left are seen as: the left-wing believes society is best served with an expanded, controlling role for the government, which use social systems and ideologies of force (e.g., socialism, fascism, communism, “progressivism”). The right believes that individual rights and civil liberties are paramount and the role — and especially the power — of the government is minimized, seen in social systems and ideologies of freedom (e.g., capitalism, classical liberalism, constitutional republicanism), and based on fundamental moral truths on which freedom depends. The left believes it is not only ok, but imperative that they take what is yours and spread it to those who did not work for it. The right believes it is their inherent right to keep what they have worked for. Example: we may ask, what about those less fortunate? The left believes in coercion (higher taxes, wealth distribution, etc) to address this problem. The right prefers to use charity and choice (charitable organizations, churches, etc) to address the problem, which by the way has been seen to provide much higher success than force. A current lesson in the news is the destruction of Venezuela by the imposition of socialism as its system of government. Socialism has NEVER worked in any country where it has ever been tried. As long as imperfect humans are running it, it can never work. Sorry for the possibly long-winded answer, but there is, in fact, much more that could be added about these political systems. And one caveat I must state, that even though capitalism is included in much of the discussion about this topic, it is actually a financial system, not a political system. The USA is a federal (constitutional) republic politically and uses capitalism as its financial system.
  3. 1 point
    I kind of agree with Joe, the criterion for distinguishing the 'left' from the 'right' seems to be as arbitrary as Hegel's dialectics. In fact, late Stanford University research fellow Antony Sutton said as much calling 'left-right' division a Hegelian trap. It stroke me as insightful enough to pose when I realized that Hitler's Nazi Germany and Stalin's USSR started the Second World War together - as de facto and de jure allies - by agreeing to and executing the division of Poland, a sovereign European state, in near perfect accord.
  4. 1 point
    Thanks for the comment. Yes it probably somewhat sweeping but hardly an accusation. A comment on the "document" before me, yes. A statement on the commentators style and research, yes. Obviously, I follow the site but I tend to have a researchers outlook (engineering law), which fortunately my kids and grand kids follow, so the first answer to a issue/event/design or problem may not be the correct one and/or even free of extraneous thought which is why cross referencing is always recommended. Without going into a blow by blow pull down of the article a simple thought would be well kept in mind - there is a difference in planning and capability. They may have "planned" to use 12 nukes but did they have the capability? Or did the fire bombing of Tokyo in April really show the way for without the massive cash requirement of the nukes? It was certainly way more effective than the nukes in terms of bodies and buildings. Without wishing to be a smart-arse, the following is an interesting look at some of the extent of the "cost" of the nukes development:- https://www.citylab.com/design/2018/05/inside-the-secret-cities-that-created-the-atomic-bomb/559601/ Remember the site is semi-historical and some of the articles/comments are in fact quite enlightening.
  5. 1 point
    HITLER IN VIENNA 1906-1913 SITES My 2017 visit to Vienna and Austria included a number of historical sites and I want to share a detailed review of the sites, connected with Adolf Hitler and his so-called 1906-1913 ‘’Viennese period”. I have used a number of books about Vienna, biographies of Hitler, including Ian Kershaw’s and Briggite Hamann’s masterpieces to cover the exhaustedly detailed 6000-word article on Hitler early years and the story of these particular city sites. As always, you can count on me to find plenty of photos and Google maps with all markings. Hope, you will enjoy the material and inspire yourself to travel, read books and to give me feedback. Please leave comments, ask questions, suggest alterations, share with friends and those interested. https://war-documentary.info/adolf-hitler-in-vienna-1906-1913/
  6. 1 point
    Here's a direct quote: "War History Online is publishing an article on a female hero of the Red Army who defended Leningrad from the very beginning of the Siege until the surrender of German troops in Kurland pocket." and there's an issue here - it implies that Kurland pocket operation was directly related to the Siege of Leningrad. It was not. The Siege of Leningrad was officially over by February 1944, over 6 months before the Kurland pocket operation would begin. Not to mention that it was quite some distance from Leningrad.
  7. 1 point
    Well, the Siege of Leningrad was predominantly a suffocating affair. Wehrmacht abandoned any meaningful attempts to take the city early on - in fact at the end of September, 1941, as I recall, all panzer divisions were redeployed to Moscow theater. So, the Finnish advance was very important in that it cut alternative supply routes to and from the city, which was a major production hub of heavy weapons in European part of Russia.
  8. 1 point
    Actually I've visited the Karelian Isthmus battlefields as both the "Winter War" and "Continuation War" are of special interest to me. Fascinating stuff ! Whether the seige of Leningrad would have taken place without Finnish (passive) participation is a moot point. As you know, they halted at the 1938 frontier before the city and, while they did move along the River Svir towards Lake Onega during the 1941-44 conflict, that was more a strategic consideration than a bid for annexation. THe point I was trying to make is- just as you did regarding the Kurland Pocket- the Battle of Tali-Ihantala was not a part the Seige of Leningrad per se, which seemed to have been the main thrust of the article
  9. 1 point
    Actually, Vyborg is comparatively close to Leningrad/St. Petersburg - just over 100 km north-west; moreover, without the Finnish advance during the Continuation War between Finland and USSR, the Siege of Leningrad would unlikely take place at all. This phase of the conflict, by the way, began with the bombing raids of Finnish cites by the Soviet VVS on June 25, 1941 - just 3 days after the launch of Barbarossa by Wehrmacht. Makes you think about the RKKA General Staff's strategic prowess. And, yes, Zhukov was the RKKA Chief of General Staff at the time, so he had something to do with that.
  10. 1 point
    This trailer is very captivating! _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Mini Militia App Lock 7Zip
  11. 1 point
    Paris 1938 Ribbentrop signs agreement with France December, 6 in ParisBig shame for us after treason against Czechoslovakia. British Pathé Movie without sound. https://youtu.be/pgyNr_Z0Vbc
  12. 1 point
    I am new to this site. RE: Even in The USA, There Are Still Many Things Folks Don’t Know Too Much About The American Civil War, seems to be a topic. But I can't find the other replies. Yes, the average US citizen does not have a clue about the War Between the States. Most think it was over slavery. It was over money. The South had money, the North wanted it. Lincoln started the crap about freeing slaves as a tool to get 100,000 men into the Union Army. His so-called, "emancipation proclamation" only freed slaves in the Confederacy. At that time, it was legal for States to leave the Union. The South left the Union and formed an independent nation. Lincoln had no authority in the South. What it did do, was make an impact in the North. Blacks joined the Union Army by the droves. If Lincoln had not done this, his army would have dried up. Also, if the war was to free slaves, why did the Union Generals own slaves? I like the question; Who owned more slaves during the war; General Lee or Grant? The answer, of course, is General Grant, a future president. General Lee freed the slaves he had. This is just the start of the discussion. There are so many other topics on the War Between the States that we could make a website just for that.
  13. 1 point
    Two U.S. Air Force A-10C Thunderbolt IIs, a P-38 Lightning and a P-47 Thunderbolt fly in formation during the 2017 Heritage Flight Training.


×