Jump to content
Wednesday, July 12, 2017

Nameless556

Private
  • Content Count

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Nameless556

    Scrapyard

    woah
  2. Nameless556

    Kreigsmarine.

    well im sure they would need landing craft,but would probably would not be only used for landing operations. Of course they would need but a lot of the forces would most likely not need them for the entire of the Marine force. As they did with the real Marine force they had at the time. Not all the seebattioloin forces had landing craft. But were still used.
  3. Nameless556

    Kreigsmarine.

    Well the Krigsmarine units were already trained in basic training. But had speicalised training to use ships and such.
  4. Nameless556

    Kreigsmarine.

    Well by 1942 thee was a excess of Kreigsmarine men. They did not have enough ships or subs so they were used as replacements. And by 1942 there were not enough tanks to "create" another panzer division.
  5. Nameless556

    Kreigsmarine.

    I have a question? Why did the kreigsmarine not train more Marines ( Seebataillon ) And why did they not build more destroyers/ light cruisers.( I understand the strains on the German economy and or dockyards ) But why not build more small ships? Or where the dockyards already set for subs by 1940. Where they too expensive to mas produce?The Marines were formed in March 1938. It initially consisted of two infantry platoons, one engineer platoon and one weapons platoon with a total strength about 250 men. I mean by 1942 they had excess men and equipment. ( also this excludes navel infantry such the ones that fought in Berlin. ) But the question still remains why did they not train more marines. To be honest I feel the German Marines effectiveness would have been something in between S.S and regular Wehrmacht infantry. Also why did they not make destroyers or light cruisers, I really do not know why they did not do this.
  6. Nameless556

    Why the Axis lost the war.

    Yes, now looking at it you are right, but I still believe that they would have waited a few years, ( 1952 is kinda ridiculous) maybe like 1944?
  7. Nameless556

    Why the Axis lost the war.

    ( sorry that post was a follow up ) But yes the treaty guaranteed . And the reason the voters in the Sudetenland was because it was a ethnic German land.
  8. Nameless556

    Why the Axis lost the war.

    Also if the Axis waited till 1942-43 to invade the soviet union they would have had a much better chance. The Russians in my oppiouin would have waited till at least 1952 to invade Gearmen Poland and Germany.
  9. Nameless556

    Why the Axis lost the war.

    Im not including things like this as they did not have the biggest impacts on the war. Yes I know that some of them did cause ww2 but I am only including the time period 1938-1945. These are some reasons why they lost the war. I know japan invading the soviet union was impractical but just wanted to throw it in there.
  10. The reasons they lost the war: 1 They did not just take out Britain after the blitz of France, Belgium etc. Yes I am aware it would still be very difficult for the Nazis to do this. 2 Invade Russia without enough materials, Tanks, Guns, men. If they had also gotten Japan to invade Siberia. Waited to gather oil from Romania, Not halt the Strumgewer program and just more men. Have Japan wait to get the united States in the war. If Japan would have waited they could very well had a better chance of winning the war. Less Submarines more cruisers. If the Nazis had built more cruisers, battleships. They could have put more of a strain on the British war effort. Better anti aircraft guns. If this was done the Nazi war effort would have been much less effective.
×